Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L

To: Carl <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
From: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:12:28 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I AM in my 'senile' years ... geezer and proud of it.
Still prefer manual tune amps over anything with a CPU in it ... they  
go bad .. when I go bad .. that's time to hang it up and run without  
an amp.
73
Don
N8DE

Quoting Carl <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>:

> Some of us prefer manual amps that can often be fixed on the fly.  Others
> prefer sending the amp back for service;  many are not even operator
> servicable.
>
> Maybe when I enter my senile years I'll need a microprocessor controlled amp
> too.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
>
>
>> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>>
>> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:51:17 EDT, CAA357@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Give the selection between: SB-220 with all of the Harbach upgrades,
>>> Clipperton L with new power supply board and recently acquired AMP-Supply
>>> LK500-NTC looks mint however not yet tested.  How would you rate each of
>>> these
>>> amps and which one would you keep?
>>
>> REPLY:
>>
>> My recommendation - dead serious - sell them all and get a good used
>> Alpha, any
>> of the 80 or 90 series.
>>
>> 73, Bill W6WRT
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>