Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L

To: Amplifier Reflector <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
From: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 01:46:11 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
All things being equal ... they all work ... I would sell the Clipperton L.
Reasoning being; the SB-220 and LK-500 use the same tubes. That
reduces your cost for spare tubes.

73, Dick, W1KSZ

> From: CAA357@aol.com
> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:51:17 -0400
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
> 
> Opinions wanted: 
>  
> Today I adopted yet another amplifier in my small formidable shack and that 
>  is really two too many hi hi. I want to lighten my load however, I  am 
> trying to decide which amplifier to keep. 
>  
> Give the selection between: SB-220 with all of the Harbach upgrades,  
> Clipperton L with new power supply board and recently acquired AMP-Supply  
> LK500-NTC looks mint however not yet tested.  How would you rate each of  
> these 
> amps and which one would you keep? 
>  
> I look forward to your input. 
>  
> Regards,
> De KA2QWC
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
                                          
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>