He asked which ONE to keep.
If 160 is important then that eliminates the SB-220. If it was my pick Id
keep the LK-500 and convert to a regular tune amp. Ive been runing a
straight LK-500ZC since the mid 80's and it hasnt burped yet.
Carl
KM1H
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: "RICHARD SOLOMON" <w1ksz@q.com>
To: "Amplifier Reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
>
> All things being equal ... they all work ... I would sell the Clipperton
> L.
> Reasoning being; the SB-220 and LK-500 use the same tubes. That
> reduces your cost for spare tubes.
>
> 73, Dick, W1KSZ
>
>> From: CAA357@aol.com
>> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:51:17 -0400
>> To: amps@contesting.com
>> Subject: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
>>
>> Opinions wanted:
>>
>> Today I adopted yet another amplifier in my small formidable shack and
>> that
>> is really two too many hi hi. I want to lighten my load however, I am
>> trying to decide which amplifier to keep.
>>
>> Give the selection between: SB-220 with all of the Harbach upgrades,
>> Clipperton L with new power supply board and recently acquired AMP-Supply
>> LK500-NTC looks mint however not yet tested. How would you rate each of
>> these
>> amps and which one would you keep?
>>
>> I look forward to your input.
>>
>> Regards,
>> De KA2QWC
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|