Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Now this here is a real ham's amp!

To: Cecil Acuff <chacuff@cableone.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Now this here is a real ham's amp!
From: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:08:00 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>

Cecil Acuff wrote:
> Kind of strange though that the ad is high lighting the tubes more so than 
> the amp.  Descriptions is misleading as well.  Must be reading out of the 
> owners manual for the time period it was made.  It's not a legal limit amp 
> by today's standards..
>
> Same old Henry problem too...no 160M.
>
> They have been selling for reasonable prices in the recent past though...
>   

I've seen a number of  2K4s in good shape going for  $700 to $800 (some 
higher and some lower)
Good amp for the price, but it's big, heavy, and as you say...no 160. I 
think they'd make a whale of a base for building up a more modern one 
though. Add a toroid and new band switch to redo the tank for 160-10. 
Lota work though to add one band.

73

Roger(K8RI)
> Cecil
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Patrick" <tpblogeditor@gmail.com>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:18 PM
> Subject: [Amps] Now this here is a real ham's amp!
>
>
>   
>> http://bit.ly/bJgIl9
>>
>> I had one of these and my 950SDX fixed. I'd never want for anything else. 
>> :)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>   
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>