Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Hmmmm...Legal limit boiled the oil in the cantena

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Hmmmm...Legal limit boiled the oil in the cantena
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:38:08 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 11:44:16 -0500, "Jeff Blaine AC0C"
<keepwalking188@yahoo.com> wrote:

>I agree with you for the real case.  But to say by definition there can't be 
>swr - I think that would only be the case with infinitely small source and 
>loads and zero spacing between.
>
>So that for whatever conductor and distance there does exist between the 
>ultimate current sources and sinks "point zero", there would exhibit the 
>standing wave due to the mismatch.  Even the anode, in a sense, has a 
>distributed conductor shape.  Pretty smeared over the geometry involved - 
>but it's got to be there.

REPLY:

I have this pictured as the antenna bolted directly to the tube's
anode. If that is not exactly the case, then SWR would exist.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>