Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW

To: <k1ttt@arrl.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:52:50 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Well, I know it was done here when the station beat the YCCC's chosen 
winner. Suddenly 3 of the members decided to visit and check things out back 
in 87.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Robbins" <k1ttt@verizon.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW


>
> cqww has started a program of on-site inspections, so yes they are looking 
> for things like that.  And of the serious contesters i know none of them 
> run excess power.
>
>
> Nov 9, 2010 08:45:37 AM, km1h@jeremy.mv.com wrote:
>
> A US magazine trying to dictate to the world is totally asinine. Let them
> run whatever their regulations permit which is the way it was for decades.
>
> I can just see the CQ Contest Committee running around the world with 
> their
> wattmeters looking for those extra watts(-;
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Alek Petkovic"
> To:
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
>
>
>> As well as all the other home brew amps that have tubes with handles.
>>
>> 2.5kW whether legal or not, is flea power when put against what we
>> hear on the bands during every big contest. Those big amps are not
>> being run at 1500 Watts. They are being run flat out. Power levels of
>> 3dB to 6dB over what is legal are being run by many stations around the
>> world.
>>
>> You can't single out one single station in China and say that it was
>> running contrary to the rules of the contest if you are not going to
>> do the same with all the others.
>>
>> I am not saying it is right. I'm just acknowledging that it happens
>> and that it is here to stay and none of us are going to stop it.
>>
>> It would be far easier to simply change the rules than it would be to
>> police power levels.
>>
>> 73, Alek
>> VK6APK
>>
>> At 12:47 PM 9/11/2010, Hsu wrote:
>>>You are right Jim.
>>>But as I know, the most buyers of Emtron DX2-5, OM2500/3500 and
>>>THP HL5KFX are contester :D
>>> 73!Hsu
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Jim W7RY"
>>>To: "Hsu"
>>>Cc: "AMPS"
>>>Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 12:19 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
>>>
>>>
>>> >I don't care if your government allows you to run 100,000 watts Hsu....
>>> >
>>> > The CONTEST rules say... 1500 watts or the power your regulations
>>> > allow.
>>> > Whichever is LOWER!
>>> >
>>> > Do you understand Hsu?
>>> >
>>> > 73
>>> > Jim W7RY
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --------------------------------------------------
>>> > From: "Hsu"
>>> > Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 7:18 PM
>>> > To: "Jim W7RY"
>>> > Cc:
>>> > Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
>>> >
>>> >> Chinese regulation is below 500W, but in contest , the
>>> club station can
>>> >> apply more power to SRRC.
>>> >> 73!Hsu
>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >> From: "Jim W7RY"
>>> >> To: "AMPS"
>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 10:29 AM
>>> >> Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> Is China allowed 2.5 KW?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Jim W7Ry
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> From: "Larry K4AB"
>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 2:21 PM
>>> >>> To: "Hsu"
>>> >>> Cc: ;
>>> >>> Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Was that 2.5KW on the output meter? No wonder B7P was so loud!
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 73,
>>> >>>> Larry K4AB
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 2010/11/8 Hsu
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> http://www.56.com/u40/v_NTYxNjg5MzM.html
>>> >>>>> http://www.56.com/u73/v_NTYxNzEyNTQ.html
>>> >>>>> http://www.56.com/u78/v_NTYxNzM3MjM.html
>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>> Amps mailing list
>>> >>>>> Amps@contesting.com
>>> >>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> Amps mailing list
>>> >>>> Amps@contesting.com
>>> >>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -----
>>> >>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> >>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> >>>> Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3244 - Release Date:
>>> >>>> 11/08/10
>>> >>>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> Amps mailing list
>>> >>> Amps@contesting.com
>>> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> -----
>>> >> No virus found in this message.
>>> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> >> Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3245 - Release Date: 
>>> >> 11/08/10
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Amps mailing list
>>>Amps@contesting.com
>>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>> http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk
>> http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6ap
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>