Mind you most receivers for the same era did not have 160 meters because
few hams were able to operate or willing to operate 160 then. For the same
reasons linear amplifiers and transmitters did not have 160 meters.
If I recall the ranges available were small in bandwidth and yoiu were very
limited in power due to LORIN system.
73
Bill wa4lav
________________________________________
From: WA3GIN [wa3gin@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 11:26 PM
To: Robert Morris; Fuqua, Bill L
Cc: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10m Receivers forSSB?
R599 rocked on RTTY ;-) w/ 4-1000 for the T-599
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Morris" <robrk@nidhog.net>
To: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10m Receivers
forSSB?
>
> On Jun 4, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Fuqua, Bill L wrote:
>
> Best to lesser perferred
> SB300 or SB301
> Drake 1A or 2B equally good for SSB but the 1A does not receive AM
> R599 is a good one but foreign made
>
> Bill
>
> Don't think the Drakes or Heath do 160.....
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|