With the cover off it might annoy bugs, birds, and 4 legged rodents. OTOH it
might decide to self destruct on its own.
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene May" <gene-may@hotmail.com>
To: "Amplifier Mailing List" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 6:12 PM
Subject: [Amps] MFJ products
I've had experience similar to that described below with their products,
of which I have a number, some active, some passive. I've learned the
following:
(a) don't believe their CCS and max ratings; IMHO they've been
somewhat optimistic.
(b) the same sentiments re QC that are expressed below. I open and
examine them the same way I would examine an early HeathKit or DynaKit
that I was resurrecting, one which I made before I had much experience in
assembly and soldering,.
Along these lines: I just got an MFJ 998RT, the 1.5 KW, 1.8 - 30.0 MHz,
remote antenna tuner. I found one of the bolts that is supposed to hold
the cover to its base with its head stripped off. I also found that they
used wire at least two gauges smaller than I would have used to wind the
coils.
QUESTION: I plan to use the 998RT in my attic right now, not outside, and
am thinking of running it with its cover off so that it runs cooler.
Their instructions say not to do this, although this seems to relate to
safety issues (high RF voltages) rather than function. The cover is made
of plastic, not metal, and therefore not a shield against harmonics
radiating. Does anyone else have any experience with running this or any
other of their remote tuners without covers (indoors, obviously)?
Comments or suggestions?
I do like their value, and as below, will probably continue to buy their
stuff, with the cautions above. I also particularly like their not
cancelling the warranty if you open the device, since I always do.
Ref SWR meters: I like the "computing" type of SWR meter, like first
described in QST by Fayman W0GI about 30 years ago. This displays SWR
directly, computing it from forward and reflected power and not requiring
one to either read some obscure needle intersection, or switch back and
forth between forward and reflected power. I still have one of his design
I made back then. Grebencamper has described an updated version (in the
ARRL Antenna Book - haven't tried it, but the circuit is similar), and
Autek Research in FL makes and sells them. I have one of these also and
like it. These are VERY handy instruments for Field Day, or for people
who have to squeeze their antennae into small attics.
Tnx es 73,
Gene May
WB8WKU
RECENT RELATED POSTINGS:
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 04:00:26 -0400
From: k8ri@rogerhalstead.com
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] SS Amp questions
On 9/10/2012 12:53 AM, Jerry Kaidor wrote:
*** My impression of MFJ is that they do have some pretty decent
engineering in their stuff, but their quality control is strictly to meet
a price.
They do make some handy equipment that works fairly well, they make some
to a price and stretch the power out beyond reliability limits, but you
only need to look at the QC on the same items built under their control
and without to see what building to a price can do.
I still use their products, but pay attention to what I get.
73
Roger (K8RI)
open the> >
> - Jerry Kaidor, KF6VB
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2437/5260 - Release Date: 09/10/12
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|