Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?

To: "Mike Waters" <mikewate@gmail.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:58:07 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Ive done it a few times using 2 suppressors in a 4 tube amp where each tube was contributing 100-300W and it seemed fine even on 10M. The tubes were GG 1625's and 813's.

OTOH a L-Pi had to be used for 10M and I dont know if it was just due to the tubes output C or the presence of the configuration creating its own problems plus the tubes C.

Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Waters" <mikewate@gmail.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 7:28 PM
Subject: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?


I'm layout out a 160m legal limit AB1 amplifier design using two parallel
833-C tubes, and a thought occurred to me: Why are two parasitic
suppressors always needed (one for each tube)?

Of course, it's not like the cost for an extra suppressor is going to
matter. It would just be easier in this application to use just one. (long
story).

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1430 / Virus Database: 2639/5616 - Release Date: 02/19/13


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>