Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?

To: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, "Amps" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:43:07 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: "Amps" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?


ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:00:58 -0500, KM1H wrote:


What were the tubes used besides your 8877 amp?

Carl
KM1H

REPLY:
The others were all ceramic tetrodes of the 4CX1000 and 4CX1500 family.

Bill, W6WRT


All are very stable tubes in a well constructed amp; I wouldnt try that with glass bottles at the high HF frequencies.

Carl
KM1H


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>