| To: | Amps <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube? |
| From: | Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:51:41 -0800 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:00:58 -0500, KM1H wrote: > >What were the tubes used besides your 8877 amp? > >Carl >KM1H REPLY: The others were all ceramic tetrodes of the 4CX1000 and 4CX1500 family. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Amps] Freescale and NXP VHF LDMOS Fets, John Lyles |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] 813 efficiency, Mike Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?, Carl |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?, Carl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |