Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS
From: John E Cleeve <g3jvc@jcleeve.idps.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:06:53 +0100
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Hello Don,

I have been following the interesting thread. I tried to use the Communications-Concept link, but there is something wrong, my brower does not like it. I then tried a direct route via Google and once I made contact with Communications-Concept, the browser, Internet Explorer stopped working again. Perhaps some one else might try the link.....I would really like to see the products on offer.

73, John G3JVC/GM3JVC.



On 11.09.2013 20:45, dsolberg@wi.rr.com wrote:
Richard,

Communication Concepts sells combiners that should work.

http://www.communication-concepts.com/index.php/splitter-combiners.html

Don
K9AQ
---- Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com> wrote:
Rumor has it that RF Parts offered a High Power Combiner, but a search of
that site
does not show it. There are a few Combiners, but no Data to tell what they
do.

Anyone have a source for a Combiner that will handle 2X 600 to 800 Watts in
??

73, Dick, W1KSZ


On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:41 AM, <dsolberg@wi.rr.com> wrote:

> While the MOSFETs can output 1200 watts with four in parallel/push-pull, > the output transformer ratio will limit the practical output to between 800 > and 1KW, using a 9:1 with a 50V power supply. The 9:1 optimal output is at > 800 watts. Tokyo HyPower uses this design and they rate it for 1KW. I can > also get 1KW with my homebrew amp with (4) SD2933's, but prefer to run it
> closer to 800 watts to improve the IMD.
>
> If you really want the full legal limit, you would be better to have two > PA modules and a combiner. Otherwise the output transformer design is > going to get real complicated. The other option is running higher voltage, > which complicates the selection of a power supply. 50 volt computer server
> switching power supplies are low cost and easy to obtain.
>
> I am happy with 800-1KW, but maybe someday I will try the combiner just
> for the fun of it.
>
> Don
> K9AQ
> ---- Leigh Turner <invertech@frontierisp.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Larry, the RF power MOSFETS to which I refer here are the VRF2933 devices > > from Microsemi. Sometimes one can find surplus and NOS ST Micro SD2933
> FETS
> > on eBay at low prices.
> >
> > 4 of these rugged 300 Watt rated devices in parallel/push-pull will
> yield a
> > saturated output power of well over 1200 Watts. Six will comfortably
> yield
> > over the US legal limit.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Leigh
> > VK5KLT
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Larry
> > Sent: Wednesday, 11 September 2013 10:48 AM
> > To: amps@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [Amps] Future of RF AMPS
> >
> > On 10-Sep-13 5:51 PM, Leigh Turner wrote: using a readily available > > multiplicity (6 devices in parallel/push-pull) of cheap 50V MOSFETS
> sourced
> > from the surplus market.
> >
> >
> > Leigh,
> >
> > Exactly which cheap MOSFETS from what surplus market are you speaking of?
> >
> > Larry - W7IUV
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>