Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Measuring IMD

To: Dave Trainor <dave@n8zfm.com>, "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Measuring IMD
From: Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net>
Reply-to: Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:11:17 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Dave,

You definitely want to reduce the power input to the spectrum analyzer down to 
something in the 0 dBm to +10 dBm level. I am not familiar with the HP 8924() 
family but I have had, in my prior life as a radio design engineer (I am now 
retired), extensive experience with spectrum analyzers, IMD measurement, etc. 

The required power attenuation can be obtained in a number of ways - use a 
'probe' (e.g. like Bird wattmeter's do), use small capacitor for decoupling, 
use a power attenuator, etc.

The probe, capacitor, etc techniques are frequency dependent (e.g. the output 
of the sampler decreases as frequency does down) but that won't affect the 
accuracy of your IMD measurements  because your are measuring IMD over a very 
small frequency range (i.e. a couple of kHz).  

If you use a good power attenuator (e.g. Bird) then you don't have to worry 
(much) about frequency variations at all.  As a side note, you can pick up high 
power 50 ohm attenuators (on eBay, etc) for not a lot of money - I have a 40 
dB, 250W Bird attenuator I got for $60 or so - a 40 dB attenuator is a darn 
decent load all by itself and the 250W rating is a continuous duty rating - the 
peak rating is determined by the voltage breakdown of the connectors and load 
which is quite a bit higher than 250W (figured that out once but have forgotten 
the details).

If you designed the system for (example) 2,000 watts and want a maximum input 
signal to the SA of 0 dBm then you need 63 dB of attenuation (i.e. 2,000 watts 
= +63 dBm = +33 dBw). 

As a side note, I would worry a bit about the 'linearity' of the Heathkit load 
when being pounded as you are talking about doing.

Much more to say but I won't burden the forum with it at this time.  If you 
have any other questions, you can contact me directly and I'll be glad to give 
you some more info.  You can also call via landline if you want (my address is 
in the Callbook)

73
Bob Groh, WA2CKY




________________________________
 From: Dave Trainor <dave@n8zfm.com>
To: "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com> 
Sent: Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Measuring IMD
 

So here is a newby question,  Let's say I have a HP8924C SA and it has a max of 
60W input, and I want to check IMD on a 1.5KW amplifier. Do I do this with a T 
connector in the line to the dummy load?  Or do I need to simply pick off a 
sample of the RF with a mica cap from the dummy load? I have one of the old 
"Cantenna" dummy loads I use and could add something to pick off a sample. What 
I don't want to do is somehow burn out my analyzer by making a silly mistake.  
I usually use it for repair/alignment work on VHF and have never tried to 
measure IMD on an HF amp but since I am in the process of collecting the parts 
I need for a tetrode amp, measuring the IMD to be sure it's clean is now 
something I'd like to do, and I am not quite sure how to safely measure that 
amount of RF, or if picking off a sample would not be a valid testing method.

73 - Dave N8ZFM 


-----Original Message-----
From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of peter chadwick
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 4:26 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Measuring IMD

The reference given to Pappenfus gives the equations for determining the level 
of 3rd and 5th order products from the curvature of the line.

Noise testing is good, provided you are sure about the peak to average ratio: 
to that end, noise with a notch in the middle of the AF passband leading to 
measurement of the IMD power in that notch is good. The technique was used over 
50 years ago in measuring FDM telephone systems, and was applied to 
multichannel HF SSB tx's.

The question  at the end of the day is 'How much use is the information about 
more accurate levels of IMD measurement except as an academic exercise?' More 
to the point is the IMD power in a SSB bandwidth at various offsets - as SM5BSZ 
has measured. Plus the fact that the vast majority of amateurs neither 
understand or care about how bad their tx is to the last few dB!

73

Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

--
This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
Click here to report this message as spam. 
http://h0stname/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=EB92528C44.DA4AC


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>