Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Solid State Amps

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Solid State Amps
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:37:37 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On 10/18/2014 1:23 PM, Manfred Mornhinweg wrote:
Chris,
I think that even the displays for smart phones and hand held devices are generic. It's the drivers that are custom. In essence they are nothing more than a miniature computer monitor screen. Why not use the same for displays in ham rigs.
HRD and SDRs use a generic computer screen to display a rather elaborate 
display.  I'd prefer the LCDs with an LED light source. They can produce 
characters of a very high definition.  Small, generic LCD screens could 
be produced for pennies, or at most, a few dollars as you can now 
purchase a 40" smart HD TV receiver for $300-$400.  There are relatively 
inexpensive video driver chips and generators that could replace the 
displays on many high end rigs if the rigs were designed in such a way 
as to not require custom displays, but few purchase rigs with 
sustainability in mind.  Even if we did, there is little on the market 
that would qualify and that goes well beyond the displays.  How many 
transistors used in SS rigs over the last two decades are no longer 
available?
However, HRD and other Graphical interfaces can replace most of the 
front panel, let alone the individual  displays on today's rigs.  If 
using HRD you might not even notice a failed, non essential display.  
The problem is physically replacing any display on today's rigs.  Those 
displays and drivers are produced in batches.  Once it's no longer 
financially a viable option to purchase those batches, the rigs days are 
numbered as for resale
73

Roger (K8RI)


The industry standard dot matrix display is a great idea, but what
chance manufacturers agree to such a selfless act of kindness to us
end users? ;) Individuality has its costs...
I'm not sure if perhaps you misinterpreted my "industry standard dot 
matrix display" concept. I don't mean that Kenwood, Icom, Vertex, etc, 
should define a standard shared by them! What I do mean is using 
_existing_ industry standard displays, instead of special displays 
custom-made for each radio model. So the manufacturers of ham 
equipment don't need to agree.
The displays I mean range from small, single line, 16 character ones, 
over 2 line, 4 line, all the way to graphics-capable ones. Their 
electrical interfaces are so well standardized that one can usually be 
swapped for another with little or no changes, and they exist in 
several more or less standard physical sizes.
If just one manufacturer sells radios built just from standard parts, 
with nothing critical customized in any way, and the buyers prefer 
those radios over any using special parts, it would be a win-win 
situation, and the other manufacturers would be forced to follow.
But of course this scheme fails, because 98% of all hams buy radios 
without the slightest regard for long-term maintainability, and aren't 
even able to tell a custom display from a standard one! And since 
custom displays are usually prettier than standard ones, radios with 
custom displays sell better...
Manfred

========================
Visit my hobby homepage!
http://ludens.cl
========================
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>