the contest gods spent about 3.5 mins discussing the 3 pt penality
issue at visalia and resoundly voted to leave it in place!
good luck at dayton!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Priest" <email@example.com>
To: "CQ-Contest" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Dayton Topics past WRTC
> Hello All.........
> While we are getting together for a WRTC meeting and you are thinking
> that I'd like to give you one more topic to think about. As the new
> President of FRC I have been hearing strong rumblings that my membership
> thinks the 3 QSO penalty is excessive. What do the rest of you think? I
> have an addendum to that question. If the answer is you are satisfied with
> the 3 Q penalty do the old records get an asterisk? (i.e.: * pre-UBN.)
> do we go back (if at all possible) and subject the old records to the
> UBN scrutiny that we now suffer under? N3OC figured out we at V26B would
> have to average 70 Q's more an hour for 48 hours to approach the NA record
> in CQ Phone to pass today's average UBN figures. And what, pray tell,
> happen if I just so happen to have QSL cards for QSO's that were not
> allowed? Some things to think about on route to Amateur Radio Mecca. See
> in the Miami Room Thursday night.
> Doug W3CF
> Doug Priest W3CF
> 1360 Providence Lane
> Hatfield, Pa. 19440
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com