Al:
I certainly agree with your assessment that "Contesters and dx-pedetions are
only 20% of the
picture" and "The *casual* guy is the key to LOTW's success".
Unfortunately in my experience, the LoTW interest level of the 80% that make up
that
"casual guy" pool is unexpectedly low.
Of the 2 "Local Area Clubs", Club "A" has 2 LoTW users (including me) and Club
"B" has 0 users.
A few general observations that I been able glean thru conversations are:
1- Almost none Log at all "Electronically".
2- A few keep a paper log.
3- Almost none operate in contests, HF, VHF, 10-10, SMIRK and the like.
4- A few work Special Events and submit paper logs by USPS.
5- A couple chase 10-10#'s and one plays with collecting US Counties.
6- About 25% have HF capability, most with poor antenna systems.
7- About 75% have VHF/UHF FM Mobile/Base capability, NO CW or SSB.
8- About 99% have VHF/UHF FM HT's, but both club repeaters are dead most of the
time.
9- Most don't know, care, or work for DXCC. FEW expect to ever reach it.
10- Most don't belong to the ARRL
11- Both clubs have had their ARRL membership rate drop below the level for
ARRL Affiliation
My "Contesting Club", YCCC, has a great number of LoTW Users. I don't know the
exact percentage,
but I see a large number of club calls on the LoTW, YCCC, and this reflector.
One of my big disappointments with LoTW is the lack of use by the VHF/UHF/SHF
contesting
community. I don't why. I have uploaded my VHF contest logs from 1990 to date
with very
dismal results. The logs are there "Electronically", but not the commitment (my
assumption).
With the lack of a "Domestic QSL BURO", I thought the VHF+ community would have
jumped on
the LoTW bandwagon for VUCC and WAS conformations. STRANGE !!!
Just a few of my thoughts on how the "Casual Guys" might impact on the future
of LoTW.
73 Bob, K1VU
Ex:WA1OFR
At 11:29 5/20/2004 , Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO) wrote:
>Jamie Dupree wrote:
>
> > Now we just need more people to register, upload their
> > logs and push on. Contesters and DX-peditions are the
> > key to LOTW's success.
>
>I disagree. The *casual* guy is the key to LOTW's success. Contesters and
>dx-pedetions are only 20% of the picture and certianly don't activate every
>entity that I want a qsl for.
>
>It sure is a nice way to deal with a large volume of qsls, such as contesters
>or dx-pedetions generate, but those qso records are no good unless all the
>casual guys you worked also upload their logs.
>
>73 de Al, KE1FO
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|