CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: Limited AntennaHeight Ca

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: Limited AntennaHeight Category
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@ispwest.com
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:59:34 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:46:57 -0500, Pete Smith wrote:

>A harder problem may be achieving the requisite 
>level of trust between the two organizations, even though things seem much 
>better now than in the past, when ARRL would not even mention CQ contests 
>in QST.

_________________________________________________________

The ARRL would have to give up their Trusted QSL protocol, wouldn't
they?  How would you get around that?

--
Bill W6WRT



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.2 - Release Date: 11/24/2004

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>