CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: Limited AntennaHeight Ca

To: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: Limited AntennaHeight Category
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@ispwest.com
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:17:16 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:01:16 -0500, Pete Smith wrote:

>I think it is infinitely more probable that 
>people would try to game a system based on confirming one QSO at a time 
>(EQSL or LotW) than one based on contest logs where both logs would have to 
>be in the system and subject to scrutiny.

_________________________________________________________

I don't know about eQSL, but LoTW requires *both* QSLs in order to
validate the QSO.  You can submit yours, but unless the other guy
submits his, it doesn't count for anything.

I suspect eQSL is the same way, but I don't have firsthand knowledge.

--
Bill W6WRT



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.2 - Release Date: 11/24/2004

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>