CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL Practices

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL Practices
From: sawyered@earthlink.net
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 12:41:27 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I guess it is time to come out of the closet on this.  I personally, have a 
hard (check that), impossible time keeping up with the QSL requests for contest 
Qs through the Bureau.  I have not answered QSLs through the bureau for my home 
call of N1UR or K8EP unless it specifically says "Need for WAS" or "Need 
County" or something.  Meanwhile I am 100% on any direct QSLs regardless of 
postage unless it is an Extra Class call using a post card (the person should 
know better) and expecting me to Post Card Back.  If he/she needs VT that bad, 
send an SASE (assuming they know and as an Extra Class ham, they should...).

Meanwhile, I do 100% QSL on all of my DX calls (XX9TEP, PJ2E, C6ARS) through 
the bureau.  I have probably done 5000 of those in the last 3 years.

Not saying that it is the best, but at least I am being honest....any others 
want to join me?

I have to say, I feel no obligation to respond to the umpti-umpf'd time I have 
received one of the mass generated QSLs off of computers of some of the EU 
contest stations.  Some of them, at least now, say, DON"T QSL back.

73

Ed  N1UR

If you want a N1UR, K8EP, NV1N, XX9TEP, PJ2E, or C6ARS card, just send me an 
SASE or 1 IRC.  You'll get one back in a couple of weeks.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>