CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843

Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
From: "Cedrick \"Fred\" Johnson - WT2P" <fredwt2p@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:14:07 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ok-

So, what's going to happen when 20M gets too full in a SSB contest? Oh, I
think I'll just jump on down to 14.025 in SSB and call CQ because the SSB
portion of the band is 'full' on one of the biggest SSB contests of the
year!

It definitely is a fun hobby yes, I have no disagreements there.

.02p


Cedrick "Fred" Johnson
WT2P - ex. K9YO, N9YXA
New York, NY 10031
AIM: k9yo
fredwt2p@gmail.com
http://chibondking.blogspot.com
Fixed Income | Derivatives | Equities | Research

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Randy Lake
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 9:37 AM
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843

It has nothing to do with the new era of no Morse and everything to do with
the band full all the way to the top during the largest world wide 160m ssb
contest in the world. There is nothing illegal about working ssb below 1840.
I love 160 and love cw, but I see nothing wrong with utilizing the band
where needed for this weekend. Check the band on Monday and see how much ssb
there is. If the bandwidth on ssb was 200hz or so we would not need to be
spread out quite so much. Things will be back to normal soon ! I was running
around 1945 most of the time and did work KH6MD on around 1810 this am. This
hobby sure is fun !!
73, Randy N1KWF

Cedrick "Fred" Johnson - WT2P wrote:
> Welcome to the new era of No Morse on the bands...
>
>
> 2p
>
>
> Cedrick "Fred" Johnson
> WT2P - ex. K9YO, N9YXA
> New York, NY 10031
> AIM: k9yo
> fredwt2p@gmail.com
> http://chibondking.blogspot.com
> Fixed Income | Derivatives | Equities | Research
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
> k8vf_mark@centurytel.net
> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 9:47 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
>
> Is it common for fellows to be on SSB below 1843?
> I havent noticed it in a while.
>
> Sure is tough on the 1830-35 DX window.
>
> What is the thought on this?  I dont see why SSB is necessary below 
> 1843, which is the normal band plan.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> K8VF
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>   

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>