It has nothing to do with the new era of no Morse and everything to do
with the band full all the way to the top during the largest world wide
160m ssb contest in the world. There is nothing illegal about working
ssb below 1840. I love 160 and love cw, but I see nothing wrong with
utilizing the band where needed for this weekend. Check the band on
Monday and see how much ssb there is. If the bandwidth on ssb was 200hz
or so we would not need to be spread out quite so much. Things will be
back to normal soon ! I was running around 1945 most of the time and did
work KH6MD on around 1810 this am. This hobby sure is fun !!
73, Randy N1KWF
Cedrick "Fred" Johnson - WT2P wrote:
> Welcome to the new era of No Morse on the bands...
>
>
> 2p
>
>
> Cedrick "Fred" Johnson
> WT2P - ex. K9YO, N9YXA
> New York, NY 10031
> AIM: k9yo
> fredwt2p@gmail.com
> http://chibondking.blogspot.com
> Fixed Income | Derivatives | Equities | Research
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> k8vf_mark@centurytel.net
> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 9:47 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
>
> Is it common for fellows to be on SSB below 1843?
> I havent noticed it in a while.
>
> Sure is tough on the 1830-35 DX window.
>
> What is the thought on this? I dont see why SSB is necessary below 1843,
> which is the normal band plan.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> K8VF
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|