CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] logic here?

To: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>,"CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] logic here?
From: "Dick Pechie" <kb1h@myeastern.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 07:53:58 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I confess, I was one of those and probably the station Rick mentions. What
little operating I have done so far this weekend on 80M  I for one have
found the rate to be better operating the "old" way. Maybe after everyone
(DX that is) catches on to the new privileges the logical thing is to
operate simplex down low.

Dick - KB1H
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit "The Barnstormers Contest Group - NZ1U"
website http://www.qsl.net/kb1h/

24/7 Webcam Link on the website

Email KB1H@arrl.net   YCCC----> http://www.yccc.org/

KB1H DXSpider Node ------>  dxc.kb1h.com port 7300

2 Meter access on 144.930 Mhz.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 8:38 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] logic here?


> Hi all...just listening around on 75 m ssb  during the ARRL SSB test and
observed the following....US station N2XYZ cqing on a 3820 +- freq and qsx
on 3670+- freq...why do this? Why not cq on 3670 and listen on that same
freq? We now have the privileges for the freq and they are definitely quiet
enough?? Or am I entirely missing something here? de Rick nq4i
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>