CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] logic here?

To: "'Rick Dougherty'" <nq4i@contesting.com>,"'CQ Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>,"'David Gilbert'" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] logic here?
From: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:52:09 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I called a lot of CQs betweem 3650 and 3720 and got only a few answers.  The
guys Cqing up above 3800 seemed to be doing better.  Results drive actions!


It was strange to have all that wide open space and nobody to work.  A true
worldwide contest like WPX or WW will be more interesting.

Randy, K5ZD 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rick Dougherty
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 9:36 AM
> To: CQ Contest; David Gilbert
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] logic here?
> 
> The person in question has an extra class license...de Rick
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Gilbert" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
> To: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 11:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] logic here?
> 
> 
> >
> > Hi, Rick.
> >
> > Two possibilities quickly come to mind, but I'm sure there 
> are others.
> >
> > a.  N2XYZ is an Extra Class licensee but doesn't realize that the 
> > rules now allow him to transmit on 3670.
> >
> > b.  N2XYZ is a General Class licensee and isn't allowed to transmit 
> > below 3800, but figures he can snag a quieter listening 
> frequency down 
> > the band..
> >
> > 73,
> > Dave   AB7E
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Rick Dougherty wrote:
> > > Hi all...just listening around on 75 m ssb  during the 
> ARRL SSB test 
> > > and
> observed the following....US station N2XYZ cqing on a 3820 +- 
> freq and qsx on 3670+- freq...why do this? Why not cq on 3670 
> and listen on that same freq? We now have the privileges for 
> the freq and they are definitely quiet enough?? Or am I 
> entirely missing something here? de Rick nq4i
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Subvert the dominant paradigm.
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>