| To: | <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Worked B4 - a new twist! |
| From: | "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:37:29 +0300 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
... >1. Why didn't the guy just work me without the argument? > We both would have saved time. If there is a general error in the log, that will correct your log. CQWW and other good contests give penalty for mis-logging... nah - flip the mirror: CQWW and other good contests show real credit for good logging. It is a great gift to genuinely drive for logging accuracy. ... >73 - Jim AD1C 73, Jukka OH6LI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CW is over-rated, Marijan Miletic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING, Robert Chudek - K0RC |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Worked B4 - a new twist!, Jim Reisert AD1C |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] PUN, Tony Rogozinski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |