In a message dated 7/10/2007 4:34:20 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
dezrat@copper.net writes:
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:44:49 EDT, Jimk8mr@aol.com wrote:
>For what purpose? To supposedly "level the playing
>field"...which it will actually not do. The latter is a myth that
>has yet to be achieved, even in WRTC. Isn't it time to stop using
>the term and deluding ourselves?
------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
The purpose of "leveling the playing field" is to increase competition
between participants. In radio contesting it can never be made
perfectly level although WRTC comes pretty close. That doesn't mean we
shouldn't stop trying.
Would you agree that having classes like high power/low power and
single op/multi op are good things? Those are attempts to level the
playing field and they are widely accepted. Would you like to see them
eliminated?
Bill W6WRT
------------------------------------------------
Those first words were not mine, but me quoting W4ZV.
The purpose of "leveling the playing field" is to allow a meaningful
comparison of the operating skill of those involved.
I have no problem with low power, high power, SO, MO, etc.
My point is that for the most level of playing fields, you'll find it in the
mobile competition of a good state qso party.
73 - Jim K8MR
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|