CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take t

To: <n2ic@arrl.net>, cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else?
From: Denis K7GK <k7gk@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:16:54 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> If you work someone, and they have been given the impression that the QSO was 
> > completed successfully (i.e. by completing it with "TU N2IC SS"), then you 
> are > obligated to leave the QSO in your log. 
...
> Steve, N2IC
 
A related question is what is considered sufficient for completing the QSO, 
especially on CW?
For example (say in CQWW CW):
 
XX1XX: CQ TEST XX1XX XX1XX
K7GK:   K7GK
XX1XX: K7GK 5NN 14
K7GK:   R 5NN 3
XX1XX: <see below>
 
case 1:
XX1XX: TU XX1XX
case 2:
XX1XX: TEST XX1XX
case 3:
XX1XX: EE XX1XX
case 4:
XX1XX: EE
 
Case 1 is pretty clear-cut, I keep the QSO. Other cases are not so clear to me. 
What if I miss EE due to QSB or QRM, should I ask for confirmation? Clearly, 
this is where experience should help, it depends on how loud XX1XX in, how 
heavy is the pile-up on him, and so forth. Also, do I have to use some kind of 
confirmation in my reply (R in the example)?
All of this is of particular interest to me since I plan on using Win-Test in 
WW (for the first time seriously) and I'm figuring out all the messages/key 
mapping and related stuff.
 
73, Denis - K7GK
_________________________________________________________________
Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by 
today.
http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff2.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_OctWLtagline
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>