CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers and QRP

To: kr2q@optonline.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers and QRP
From: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:04:12 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
And the station this past weekend sending "5NN NNN" felt it meant "599 999"
for the standard signal report and 999 watts.

73    Hank    K8DD


On Feb 18, 2008 3:47 PM, <kr2q@optonline.net> wrote:

> >I had several stations send me a NN for their power.  I assumed they were
> running 99 watts
> >and that's how I logged it.  Was I right or wrong?
> >
> >Maybe a way to solve this cut number crap is to have 3 categories and
> only 3 acceptable
> >ways to send it.  As an example:
> >
> >L = Low Power (no more than 150 watts)
> >H = High Power (Over 150 watts)
> >Q = QRP (10 watts or less)
>
> [snip]
>
> >Dick
> >W0RAA
>
> Excuse me Dick....but part of your quote is wrong.
>
> >From the ARRL RULES:
> 2.1.3.1.QRP: 5-W PEP output or less.
>
> PLEASE do not call QRP 10 watts or less.
>
> As for cut numbers, NN = 99 just like 5NN = 599.  Did anyone ever question
> what 5NN is?
>
> de Doug KR2Q
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 

'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their
level then beat you with experience.'      -anon
--
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>