CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers...

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers...
From: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:02:19 -0600 (CST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I spent TEN MINUTES trying to get "EN61jp" across on CW in the 10 GHz 
contest a couple years ago. I eventually succeeded.
:-)

73, Zack W9SZ

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Steve Sacco wrote:

> If we can chose the check number, wouldn't it make sense for everyone, on 
> least on CW to chose "55"?
>
> In any event, it would be logical for everyone to use the same number.
>
> I'm pretty sure the reason for using the "first licensed" number is to force 
> the use of *different* numbers, and make the exchange a tiny bit more 
> challenging.
>
> *sigh*...
>
> Maybe it's me, but contesting seems to be developing into something 
> indistinguishable from a courtroom full of lawyers trying a case, and the 
> cleverest lawyer "wins", regardless of the merits of the case.
>
> 73,
>
> Steve NN4X
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>