| To: | Cq-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise |
| From: | N1MM <tfwagner@snet.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:11:58 -0500 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Why not ask the ARRL to enforce the rule for the 50 most needed DXCC entities and waive it for the rest? The contest sponsors could omit the logs from the same entities. Or they could just remove the timestamps. Tom - N1MM _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule...the introduction (aka CONTEXT), Paul O'Kane |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report, David Robbins K1TTT |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule...the introduction (aka CONTEXT), Paul O'Kane |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise, Glenn VA3DX |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |