| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule...the introduction (aka CONTEXT) |
| From: | k4zw@comcast.net |
| Date: | Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:31:22 +0000 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
>Could it be that the security and sanctity, not to mention the integrity, of >DXCC is a little over-rated? Yup ? now we have chat rooms to coordinate QSO?s and software to aid in weak signal reception/decoding. So it goes? K4ZW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs, Rex Maner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise, Glenn VA3DX |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule...the introduction (aka CONTEXT), VR2BrettGraham |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 2008 ARRLDX SSB - US/VE 3830 Claimed Scores 06Mar2008, mwdink |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |