CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges
From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:20:46 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
No, it is not.
At the time the RST reporting system was developed S-meters were entirely
not existing.

http://www.hamuniverse.com/rst.html

Most S-meters are useless for signal strength measurement anyway considered
S9=50µV.
S-meters won´t work if AGC is switched off (cw-contest) or attenuation is
switched in.

In a contest if you run on a frequency being called by a station it often is
59 and in the next moment you have 9+20 qrm on top of that station and you
have to ask several times for repeats.
Are you going to change the report to Q2 every time?

Most signals have been higher then S9 on the weekend, what about those
reports?

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dave/KA1NCN

Secondly, I disagree with the notion that a report is entirely subjective.
The ?S? part, as I understand it, is supposed to be derived from whatever
one?s S-meter is reading. 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>