CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>, steve.root@culligan4water.com, CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:22:22 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
"Those in 8-land, 9-land, 0-land, etc. often miss short openings because they 
don't think a band will open. Skimmer running on a second radio or third 
receiver will alert the operator when those short openings/multipliers appear. 
Skimmer technology will not completely eliminate the advantage enjoyed by those 
in coastal New England but it is one more tool the single operator can employ 
to narrow the gap. 73, ... Joe, W4TV "

Oh, I don't know. I humbly suggest that those of us in 8, 9, and 0-land might 
not miss as many openings as someone who doesn't live here might think. We use 
our ears to listen to the second radio, or rely on years of experience 
operating here. If you hear a short opening in 4 land and there aren't 8's, 
9's, and 0's calling it's because they don't have propagation. Not because 
we're too dim to pick up on a band opening.

Either way, it all seems to be a wash. If Skimmer can find band openings for a 
guy in Michigan it will also find band openings for guys in Vermont. The only 
possible way Skimmer cvould provide a tactical advantage is if 1) You know how 
to use it correctly, and 2) Nobody else owns one.

73 Steve K0SR

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>