CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer in CQ WPX CW

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer in CQ WPX CW
From: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:06:22 +0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I would personally position a computer, giving intellectual assistance
as being a machine-based operator, another operator at the station.

That is, I would consider Skimmer+human a multioperator station.

The decisions how to interprete the rules are of course down to the
people governing the contests.

For WPX CW the interprettion seems fixed - at least for this year.

All OH, OG prefixes will be available.
Likely even one OJ prefix will be on the air.
Maybe even some OF.

Lots of prefixes to log - trying to maximise the Fun.
See you !


73,
Jukka OH6LI

...
>I want to remind everyone that the CQ WPX CW Contest is this coming
weekend.
>Please get on and enjoy the fun.  We welcome all log submissions large
and
>small!  Full rules, records, and past scores are available at
www.cqwpx.com.
>
>
>The current single op rules do not prevent the use of a skimmer located
>within your own station.  If you do give skimmer a try, please note it
in
>your soapbox or send me an email with your observations on how it
helped >(or
>hurt) your score.  We are seeking all input as we consider what
changes, if
>any, need to be made to the rules in response to this new technology.
>
>
>Randy Thompson, K5ZD
>Director, CQ WPX Contest
>www.cqwpx.com


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>