CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9

To: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9
From: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:37:48 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree.  I spent a few hours operating from another ham's station in a 
multi-single effort using our club call K9CU.  Conditions were about as 
bad as I ever heard them.

73, Zack W9SZ

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Barry wrote:

> Condx were miserable.  This is the first contest I can remember where I
> just S&P'd and never called CQ.  10 was useless.  15 was almost useless
> - big guns were workable, little guns weren't there. 20 was too crowded
> to find a clear spot.  40 was 40, with too many EUs listening only below
> 7100.  80 was a mess - too many EUs operating  way down in band where NA
> was covered in EU QRM, and our antennas don't work well below 3700,
> anyway.  160 was 160, especially on SSB.
>
> I had more fun playing with Morserunner and practicing my CW typing on
> lcwo.com.
>
> Barry W2UP
>
>
> Alan Leith wrote:
>> Almost every one of the stations you mentioned are big guns with lots of
>> power and great antenna systems.  They are, in no way, indicative of band
>> conditions.  The little pistols, like you and me, are still down in the mud
>> and washed away by QSB.
>>
>> The only good thing is that signals other than the big guns' might come up
>> out of the noise long enough to scrape out a QSO.
>>
>> Mind you, out here on the east coast, signals from Europe were fairly
>> reasonable for several hours.  However, to me, several hours does not a
>> contest make.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Al, VE1AL
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
>> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of KI9A@aol.com
>> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 10:54 AM
>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9
>>
>> I just made pass thru 20 meters, and made a few notes of signal  strengths.
>>
>> Obviously not scientific!
>>
>> Rig ICOM 756 PRO3, AGC set slow. No preamp on, 2.4 filter Ant Cushcraft A3
>> tribander at 25'
>>
>> 1330 Z  ( 8:30am local) in Belleville, IL
>>
>> RW1AC 59+20 loudest on the band
>> ER0WW +15
>> DR1A +15
>> RK2FWA +10
>> LY5R +10
>> S56M +10 must have had bad rx freq  had at least 5 calling, did not  hear
>> any of them OK4U +10 OH5Z +10 OH4A +10 RK3DZB +5 ES5TV +5 RL3A +5 IR2C +5
>> SO0Q 59 DR5Z 59 GI5K 59 SM6U 58 YT1BB 58 IO2L 58
>>
>> Just an idea of what the loudest European stations sound like, in southwest
>>
>> Illinois, on 20, at the bottom of the solar cycle, with a low tribander!
>> And
>> condx today seem very good!!
>>
>> 73- Chuck KI9A
>>
>> **************Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your
>> favorites, no registration required and great graphics - check it out!
>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir=
>> http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1747 - Release Date: 10/26/2008 
>> 9:27 AM
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>