CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now!

To: KI9A@aol.com, wn3vaw@verizon.net, cq-contest@contesting.com, stan@aqity.org
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now!
From: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: phriendly1@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:51:46 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There were at least a few key clicks, although not as many as in the past... 
Still a couple ummm, for a lack of a better description, "spark" operations 
going on. Hope they found the problem, if they knew they had one.

Propagation was interesting, some known LP signals were 599 plus 45 over here 
Saturday morning. KB7Q was plus 10 Saturday morning, Sunday morn he was just a 
whisper.

That's part of the Top Band appeal ;o)

Julius Fazekas
N2WN

Tennessee Contest Group
TnQP http://www.tnqp.org/

Elecraft K2/100 #3311
Elecraft K2/100 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366


--- On Sun, 12/7/08, Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net> wrote:

> From: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now!
> To: KI9A@aol.com, wn3vaw@verizon.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
> Cc: smc@w9smc.com
> Date: Sunday, December 7, 2008, 11:36 PM
> The 2nd harmonic thing is very real.  In years past I have
> personally heard some of the big guys on 160M as loud as S8
> on the meter exactly double their TX frequency on 160M.  You
> go down to 160M and find them 40-50 over S9.  Haven't
> listened lately but sure if you had listened between 3600
> and 3690 this past weekend you would have heard a lot of CW
> that was fundamentally on 160M.
> 
> Direct e-mails between a friend of mine and one who had a
> very stong 2nd harmonic indicated some work would be done to
> further reduce the attenuation and no doubt it has been done
> by now.
> 
> An humerous example of a second harmonic situation that
> some may remember...I think it was perhaps the last ARRL DX
> Contest when a ZF2 had a HUGE pileup on 40M, answering
> almost no one.  When he did go back to someone, you could
> not hear the guy he was working  He was spotted on packet, I
> think was working single band 80M, and was S9 on 40M in
> Arkansas.  Easy multiplier we thought....  It was by far the
> largest pileup on the band and he was calling CQ on 80M with
> few takers since it was late in the contest and he had
> worked almost everyone on that band.  
> 
> Stan, K5GO
> 
> ---- Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net> wrote: 
> > Ha!
> > 
> > Kudos & 2 points to your Dad!
> > 
> > 73
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> > [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of
> KI9A@aol.com
> > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 4:46 PM
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Cc: smc@w9smc.com
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now!
> > 
> > 
> > Last night, my Dad, AD9P, was on 75 SSB checking out
> his new Pro3 on phone,
> > and got into a ragchew with a, umm, pigfarmer ( yeah,
> not a "real"
> > pigfarmer..),  and when he was about to sign with him,
> he told the guy he
> > was going to
> > QSY to  160 and make some contest Q's.
> > 
> > The "pigfarmer" then went off on my Dad
> about how all of the contesters
> > were
> > QRMing 75 SSB with their 2nd harmonics..So, my pops
> proceeded to tell him
> > needs to invest in a new radio, because his was
> obviously defective.
> > 
> > I can be struck by lightning now. I have heard
> everything...2nd
> > harmonics..hehe. Wow.
> > 
> > 73- Chuck KI9A
> > **************Make your life easier with all your
> friends, email, and
> > favorite sites in one place.  Try it now.
> >
> (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000
> > 010)
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>