CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories
From: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Reply-to: Vladimir Sidorov <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:07:13 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/XtremeCQ_WW_Experimenter_June.pdf
3. The entrant's transmitting sites must be located in a single country, as 
defined by the applicable licencing authority, and a single zone. Receiving 
sites may be located anywhere.

I will not be surprised if the DXCC AC comes up with a declaration, contacts 
established during the CQ WW contests don't count towards DXCC anymore as 
conducted using non-amateurs means.

73,
Vladimir VE3IAE

---



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Laney" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Cc: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories


> Prasad wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> That is a very interesting way of looking at this new Xtreme category.
>> I first took part in CQWW CW 1987 to try and work some new countries for
>> DXCC - ultimately worked all of 30 QSOs in 48 hours for 30 new ones 
>> (WOW).
>>
>> Till date, due to one reason or other I have not worked XE (Zone 6) -
>> now, how about a remote station in California to work that elusive one 
>> :))
>>
>> That will take care of my WAZ after 24 years in ham radio!!!
>>
>> BUT, I would not be legal within my VU2 license conditions - so no remote
>> station :(
>>
>> 73 de Prasad VU2PTT (also W2PTT).
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:38 PM, <N2GC@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like the new categories except for the remote receiver part.  Guys 
>>> using
>>> remote receivers are going to effect the scores and fun of people not 
>>> in
>>> the extreme categories.  For instance, if I am SOSB160 QRP (or HP with a
>>> crappy ant like in my case) and I can hear a JA from my QTH in NY and I
>>> call
>>> him  and he comes right back to me because he is using a remote receiver 
>>> 10
>>> miles  from me. What fun is that? You are taking the DX part out of the
>>> contest. What  if there are 100 guys in 100 different countries on 160
>>> using
>>> remote receivers  in NY and I work them all using 5W to a coat hanger 
>>> and
>>> they
>>> send me a  QSL card afterward will ARRL accept them for DXCC?
>>>
>>> Mike, N2GC
>>> **************An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy
>>> Steps!
>>> (
>>> http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221322979x1201367215/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=Jun
>>> eExcfooterNO62)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
> I guess I'll have to go back and read the CQ Magazine announcement
> again.  When it was announced at the contest forum in Dayton, I
> understood that remote receiver sites would be limited to the same CQ
> zone as the transmitting antennas.  In most, but not all, cases, that
> would be in the same country as the transmitting antennas.  Maybe this
> was not part of the announcement, but that's what I understood at
> Dayton.  73, John, K4BAI.
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>