If fun for majority should be keeping old fashion way, then old categories
are unchanged and will be more popular. .
New Extreme is logical step forward in 21th century. I guess, it will not be
a lot of participants, but it giving nice opportunity for improvements and
legality.
I am only strongly disagreed with this part in rules:
*Remote receiving sites may be located anywhere........*
With this rule, nice idea of widening area for improvements and technology
will be bury with no sense remote receiving. All real technology
improvements can't fight with just a simple remote receiver close to
correspondence site. Really, it looks like a mistake of rules creator and
has to be reconsidering. It is not improvement at all. It looks much more
like contesting holocaust...hahaha
73
Ranko
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ashraf CHAABANE" <a.chaabane@alpha-engineering.com.tn>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22
> Yes, Marc, I agree with you!
>
> I red the first paragraph in the CQ Article "A new "Xtreme" category is
> being added to the CQ World-Wide DX Contest to encourage the development
> of
> new technologies in amateur radio communications in general and contesting
> in particular"
>
> For me, no need to read the rest, I didn't like this! Where is the fan
> contesting this way?!
>
> Ashraf, 3V8SS
>
> http://www.qsl.net/3v4-002/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.71/2178 - Release Date: 06/15/09
17:54:00
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|