CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting rationale

To: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>, "CQ-Contest@contesting. com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting rationale
From: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:43:05 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ahhh...How quickly we forget.

The first spotting cluster was started by YCCC (a contest club) to assist in 
spotting stations in contests.

It was not a tool for DXers and not their eminent domain...

73 Rich NN3W
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Coslo" <mjc5@psu.edu>
To: "CQ-Contest@contesting. com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting rationale


> 
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:48 AM, Zoli Pitman HA1AG wrote:
> 
>> Andrew wrote:
>>> how
>>> useful would the spotting network be during a contest if everyone
>>> repeatedly spotted themselves non-stop for 48hrs?  It would be  
>>> chaos and
>>> the cluster would probably fall over within minutes!
>> this sounds like a good idea to me... even better if this code  
>> included
>> randomized calls and frequencies.. :-)
> 
> 
> Yikes! You've just described a small denial of service attack. It's  
> also the equivalent of jamming. Really bad idea, even to joke about.
> 
> In addition, the DX clusters are there for DX'ers. That they get  
> hijacked by contesters is one thing, but when we talk about posting  
> bogus info, or to bring them down, that's not a good thing.
> 
> 
> -73 de Mike N3LI -
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>