CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ TEST or CQ DX

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>, "'W7VJ'" <w7vj@millerisar.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ TEST or CQ DX
From: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:09:00 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Maybe call cq dx test, then its obvious!


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julius Fazekas [mailto:phriendly1@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 17:18
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com; W7VJ
> Cc: hwardsil@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ TEST or CQ DX
> 
> I did hear both US and DX stations calling CQ DX... The couple of non-US
> stations were not sending contest exchanges, as the contest progressed I
> tended to pass by any station calling CQ DX.
> 
> Which, in some cases was good, and in some cases was bad. Seems like being
> flexible is still the best solution...
> 
> 73,
> 
> Julius Fazekas
> N2WN
> 
> Tennessee Contest Group
> http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html
> http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en
> 
> Tennessee QSO Party
> http://www.tnqp.org/
> 
> Elecraft K2/100 #4455
> Elecraft K3/100 #366
> Elecraft K3/100 #1875
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 2/23/10, W7VJ <w7vj@millerisar.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: W7VJ <w7vj@millerisar.com>
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ TEST or CQ DX
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Cc: hwardsil@gmail.com
> > Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 9:10 PM
> >
> > Sorry, Ward, I don't get this... CQ DX?  Then one
> > might think that the
> > station is DXing and not contesting adding to the
> > confusion.  I have yet to
> > hear anyone in a contest consistently calling CQ DX.
> > That's like changing
> > standard operating procedures to satisfy the
> > infinitesimally limited number
> > of those who are uninformed.  Did the K3LR team call
> > "CQ DX?"
> >
> > VJ
> >
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:58:01 -0800
> > From: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ TEST or CQ DX
> > To: "CQ-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> > Message-ID:
> > <5A40946FF31541C1A43C35B5E2B7B20A@WardsLaptop>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Part of the reason US stations call is that we are calling
> > "CQ TEST", not
> > "CQ DX".  95% of the time, somebody calling "CQ TEST"
> > is perfectly happy to
> > get a contact from anywhere, including same-country
> > stations.  I'm not
> > suggesting anybody change the way they call CQ, just
> > pointing out that from
> > the call it is not intuitively obvious that only DX
> > stations are being
> > sought.  Work 'em and move on - if you log them,
> > fine.  If you are getting a
> > lot of them, then maybe calling CQ DX would be a good
> > strategy.
> >
> > 73, Ward N0AX (thanks to our DX friends for great fun at
> > K3LR)
> >
> > W7VJ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>