CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs

To: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>, "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs
From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:48:53 +0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
That sound like a good solution for those who does not want to send QSL 
cards. Publish all your logs on the web and nobody needs your QSLs. :)

73, Igor UA9CDC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs


The problem has been that, if you were going to claim credit for some of
these QSO's for ARRL award programs (WAS, DXCC etc.) ARRL frowned on anyone
releasing full log data to the public on these QSO's. This is why when you
go to a search engine for a big DXpedition and enter someone's callsign, it
only gives you the band/modes they worked. No dates, times etc.
I don't know where ARRL stands on this now.

73, Zack W9SZ


On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Jorge Diez - CX6VM <
cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy> wrote:

> "Many contesters, including me, have allowed our CQ subscriptions to 
> expire
> because of CQs' decision to release our logs to the public.  I still
> participate in CQ contests, purely for the love contesting, but my logs 
> are
> not submitted.  Will contesters similarly withhold funds and logs from
> ARRL?
>
>
> What´s the problem with the logs to be public? Any QSO that nobody need to
> know about?
>
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>