CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report
From: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Reply-to: k0rc@citlink.net
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:38:11 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Well I asked this same question (without the RBN component) last year 
and it pretty much fell on deaf ears. As you know, the "No self 
spotting" is written into the rules, so that's how it's gonna be... 
whether the rule makes sense or can be justified.

Regarding the RBN, I was believing it would help reduce the number of 
busted calls posted. I didn't find that to be the case over the CQWW 
weekend. Whether the RBN reduced the number of busts, I don't know. i 
wasn't keeping track. It was simply my "feeling" when I saw double spots 
on the same frequency with variant callsigns.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN



On 12/2/2010 3:09 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 23:45, K1TTT wrote:
>
>> Total spots in database 56773... kind of puny when compared with the 1.7M
>> spots on the RBN though.
>
> Why is it OK to self-spot on the RBN, but
> not on the cluster?  :-)
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>