CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Keeping 'em honest

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Keeping 'em honest
From: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Reply-to: KU7Y <ku7y@qsl.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:07:21 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Don't forget that the NIL works both ways.  If I log a contact that didn't 
get my exchange but I thought he did, then I get the NIL.  So if I'm going 
for a score I also remove any contact that I didn't get any indication of 
QSL from.

If I'm just going to send in a check log then I log them all.

The last thing I want to do is cause someone else to get a NIL.  But I don't 
want one either!

In the example given I would not have logged it either because there was 
nothing to indicate that the run station got the S&P exchange.

Having done a fair amount of QRP contesting, I would think that my signal 
had dropped down into the noise and the run station lost me, meaning the 
contact was not completed.

OK, back in my hole,

Ron, KU7Y
SOWP 5545M
Brenda, AZ (Winter)
Caldwell, ID (Summer)
ku7y@qsl.net 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>