Do CW contesters stay below 060?
The problems include the number of signals in the contest and on 40m,
the different allocations in R1 and R3.
Barry W2UP
On 1/3/2011 12:47 PM, Bryon PAUL Veal n0ah wrote:
> James,
>
> The RTTY and digital crowd who just banter along all day at various
> frequencies below .060 justify dumping their signals in the CW windows as
> progress and as a result of the wonderful FCC band plan that allows for it-
> WHERE IS THE ARRL ON THIS???? - I'm not trying to bash anyone, just being
> honest based upon what hear every single day- The days of a band plan are
> over- the problem is that the ARRL has let it go for too long and the FCC
> could care less looking at their band mode allocation charts.
>
> Is anyone at the ARRL doing anything to create a band plan with the loop
> hole that the charts have created which allows for any digital mode down to
> the basement on all HF bands??
>
> 73 N0AH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Cain
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 11:50 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU
>
> I have a suggestion for RTTY RU people this weekend: stay above .060 on all
> bands.
>
> Respectfully submitted for your consideration.
>
> Jim Cain
> At The New (temporary) K1TN Superstation
> 6 miles east of Mountain, Wisconsin
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|