CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Club/Group competition

To: <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Club/Group competition
From: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:25:10 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Currently, it is strict circle distance...

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "VR2BrettGraham" <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Club/Group competition


> K5ZD asked:
> 
> > If we replace distance, what should be the definition of a club for 
> the purposes of contest club competition?
> 
> Distance seems to be more like a top-end limit for an aggregate group 
> competition.
> 
> Instead of defining it, distance categorizes it.
> 
> Problem with this is, unlike the other form of group competition in 
> radiosport - multi-op - there is no "point of diminishing returns".  And 
> like W-land itself, all over the world population density varies, so 
> categorization based on area will tend to favor density.
> 
> The definition of the group for aggregate group competition I suppose 
> could be anything, but if a meaningful aggregate group competition is 
> desired it should probably take into consideration the population of the 
> group.
> 
> > How can the new definition be checked/scored by the contest 
> administrator?
> 
> What is done presently?
> 
> 73, ex-VR2BG/p.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>