CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit

To: "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>, "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 17:41:37 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
You haven't been paying attention, Paul.

There is no need to copy callsigns.

Just point and click.

CQWW is no longer a contest which requires a radioman in attendance.  We 
need a new category --- "Assisted - No Operator"

73, de Hans, K0HB

-----Original Message----- 
From: Paul O'Kane
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 5:03 PM
To: Radio K0HB
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit

Hello Hans,

> ....horrors!!!   Nay, horror of horrors!!!!!  You sent no signal 
> report????
>
> The sponsor DEMANDS in his rules that you send a signal report!
>
> Of course this same sponsor then lets it be known that accurate copy of 
> the
> report is optional, because it is ignored in the scoring.
>
> And here we thought the contest was a test of our skills as radiomen.


It still is, but in CQWW the only skill is in copying callsigns.

This has been known for at least 8 years.  Unfortunately,
it has taken until now for you, and many others, to realise
that it is true.

<http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/cq-contest/2003-September/052762.html>

73,
Paul EI5DI




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>