CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and LOTW

To: "Michael D. Adams" <mda@ab1od.org>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and LOTW
From: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:09:35 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Two points ---

1) A number of US organizations have their own internal "bureaus".  Haven't 
heard of any of them going to prison.

2) The card sorters at Newington are our employees.  If they object to the 
workload, they are free to consider other opportunities.

73, K0HB

On Jul 23, 2012, at 6:10 PM, "Michael D. Adams" <mda@ab1od.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de> wrote:
> 
>> I also ever wondered why ARRL is only handling international cards for US
>> operators but not US to US. Anyone an explanation? Can be off list, of
>> course, not to bother anyone here. ;-)
> 
> Traditionally, the U.S. Postal Service was very jealous of its
> monopoly on mail service.
> 
> Even though those postal regulations have been interpreted a bit more
> liberally the past few years, I have the pleasure of knowing some of
> the card-sorters in Newington.  They seem busy enough as it is without
> being asked to work through a mountain of domestic cards as well.
> 
> --
> Michael D. Adams (AB1OD)
> Poquonock, Connecticut | mda@ab1od.org
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>