I am certainly not a BIG TIME CONTESTER and I have tried using the cluster
in a contest or 2 that do not make a distinction anymore. And I have to say
that I am slow enough already without taking on the added handicap of using
the cluster. If you think you need it fine. I will work the stations that
are not posted yet and not fight the pileups.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Dave Lawley <dave@g4buo.com> wrote:
>
> Really sorry to see you say this Randy. There are plenty of us who don't
> operate using the crutch of cluster.
>
> DARC ruined WAE by not making a distinction between unassisted and
> assisted and now I don't enter it any more. I'd really hate to see you make
> the same mistake with CQWW.
>
> 73, Dave G4BUO
>
>
> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:11:45 -0000
>> From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
>> To: "'Pete Smith N4ZR'" <n4zr@contesting.com>,
>> <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
>>
>> For these contests where there is no assisted category, instead of making
>> yet another category, why not just allow single ops to use assistance?!
>>
>> Anyone licensed in the last 15 years has never experienced life without
>> the
>> DX Cluster. Perhaps it is time to accept this as it is - the new normal.
>>
>> Randy, K5ZD
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/cq-contest<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>
--
Jim K0XU
jim@rhodesend.net
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|