CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:36:47 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I *think* PY5EG was agreeing with keeping them separate.  Oms?

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 1/28/2013 8:51 AM, kd4d@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Jim:

K5ZD, PY5EG, and LU5DX, among many others, ARE saying "get rid of assisted 
categories."

To quote their recent e-mails:

K5ZD:  >> For these contests where there is no assisted category, instead of 
making
yet another category, why not just allow single ops to use assistance?!

LU5DX:  >> Amen!!!!!!!

PY5EG:  >> I totaly agree
I always fight for that on CQ Committee

Randy,

I still think you are missing the point. No one is saying not to have
assisted categories. [...]

73,

Jim, K4QPL
73,

Mark, KD4D
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>