Ah - ha _ I see yet another multi thread post coming on re what is, and what is
not, assistance.
Why cannot all Contest Committees adopt the WRTC Standard ruling which makes it
pretty clear, to me anyway, what unassisted really means...
12.4. Use of DX spotting (e.g., Packet, Web, etc.), skimmer or any
other spotting and supplementary information network is not allowed. You are
not allowed to receive any assistance to learn the callsign or
exchange of any station other than by tuning the radio and listening by
human ear.
12.5. The use of any callsign database or the ‘Super Check Partial’
tool is not allowed. If the logging software incorporates this kind of
feature, it must be disabled. The logging computer(s) may display a
‘Check Partial’ list based only upon the callsigns already worked during the
contest.
Can anyone really pick holes in that? That is the way I like to play it, no
assistance, audio or visual.
73 Brian 5B4AIZ / C4Z.
________________________________
From: "Cqtestk4xs@aol.com" <Cqtestk4xs@aol.com>
To: ku7y@qsl.net; cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, 25 February 2013, 16:59
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted
Does that mean no WWV reports from the internet?
K4XS
In a message dated 2/25/2013 2:02:38 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time,
ku7y.cw@gmail.com writes:
Seems to me that maybe what's needed is a rule that prohibits a SO
Unassisted from having any internet connection.
After all, if you are in a contest as SO Unassisted, what the heck do you
need the internet for?
OK, back in my hole,
Ron, KU7Y
SOWP 5545M
Arizona Outlaws Contest Club
Silver Springs, NV
ku7y@qsl.net
http://www.hatpinsandmore.com
KX3 #0062
DM09ji
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stan Stockton" <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
To: <w1ve@yccc.org>
Cc: <n2ic@arrl.net>; "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: 25 February, 2013 4:10 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted
> It doesn't matter if all the single ops leave off the band breakdowns.
> The same opening notifications and more will be available by looking at
> the multi-operator categories - particularly M/M.
>
> As it grows the number of instances of call sign fills for the guys you
> couldn't quite copy on 160 will become more prevalent....and using all
> that information is now allowed.
>
> Get Scores will tell you however often it is chosen to update on what
band
> a particular station is running. There are no frequencies shown and
that
> has been determined to be OK. How about adding all the stations from RBN
> calling CQ but without frequencies (just bands) shown? Not a lot
> different than what you would have if everyone signed up for Get Scores.
>
> Let's face the facts. You need to be on the Internet and take advantage
of
> any and all internet assistance that is now allowed to maximize your
> success in a single operator, "unassisted" entry. Someone who does not
> have a computer connected to the Internet does not have all the possible
> advantages of someone who does have that connection in an unassisted
> entry.
>
> 73...Stan, K5GO
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 24, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> I do see your point. The "player" remark was unfortunate... I can see
>> in
>> these situations where it could make a difference.
>> So -- that's why you guys don't post. However, you could post,
>> motivating
>> others, by posting score not breakdown. That is totally feasible.
>> That way, in your instance N2IC would see K5GN's score going up, but
have
>> no idea why.
>>
>> When K5ZD posts, he always masks his breakdown.
>>
>> Perhaps you would consider posting your score if the site automatically
>> masked the breakdown of SO stations?
>>
>> Food for thought...
>>
>> I'm off to 8P in the morning... play more radio than internet.
>>
>> 73. Gerry
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 24, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Gerry Hull<gerry@yccc.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Stan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Getscores has been up for more than five years, and the Russian site
>>>>> has
>>>>> been up for a year or so. No contesting authority has made any
>>>>> restriction
>>>>> against the sites, and I don't think they will.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are using the score posting site to make decisions about what
>>>>> to
>>>>> do
>>>>> in a contest, you are not a player at all.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> Gerry, I don't know how to interpret this statement.
>>>
>>> There is no doubt that the score posting system could provide valuable
>>> information to the single-op, unassisted, serious competitor. Last
>>> weekend's ARRL DX CW is a perfect example. N2IC(/5) and K5GN were both
>>> SOAB
>>> HP, vying for the top spot in W5, and top-10 national positions.
Neither
>>> of
>>> us posted to, or watched the score posting sites, even though there is
>>> nothing in the rules to stop us. However, for the sake of discussion,
>>> let's
>>> say K5GN posted his score, with band breakdowns, and N2IC was
observing
>>> the
>>> score posting site. During the actual contest, K5GN did indeed catch
>>> good
>>> European openings on 20 meters during the wee hours of the morning,
both
>>> mornings. N2IC did not, and in fact, didn't look for those openings.
>>> K5GN
>>> made many more 20 meter QSO's, and finished ahead of N2IC. If N2IC
>>> could,
>>> at a glance, see that K5GN was suddenly piling on 20 meter QSO's at
>>> strange
>>> times of the day, do you think he would react to that information ?
>>> Would
>>> he still be a "player" ? Would he still be unassisted ?
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Steve, N2IC
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>
http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/cq-contest<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|