CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes

To: "n2ic@arrl.net" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes
From: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 14:27:27 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Not so, Steve.

If I cobble up your call in SS, I simply lose that Q.  There is no
"encouragement penalty" beyond that.

73, Hans, K0HB

On Friday, May 24, 2013, Steve London wrote:

> On 05/24/2013 01:19 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:
>
>> Kelly,
>>
>> The station which makes the "most clean Q's" should win.
>>
>> If I make 800 Q's with no errors and you make 805 Q's with 4 errors (same
>> mults), then you beat me 801 to 800.  Unless we played in a socially
>> engineered contest like CQWW.
>>
>
> This may disappoint you Hans, but virtually every major contest is
> "socially engineered" by your definition. Please take your politics to a
> more appropriate, non-ham-radio reflector.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
>  73, Hans, K0HB
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/cq-contest<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>


-- 
73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a boy and his radio"
--
Sea stories at --------> http://K0HB.wordpress.com
Superstition trails ---> http://OldSlowHans.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>